No ascendant in the usual sense
The most striking departure is structural. A Lal Kitab kundli fixes Aries to the first house for everyone, and places the planets into that fixed frame. There is no rotating lagna as there is in a Parashari chart.
The practical consequence is that a Lal Kitab reading depends far less on an exact birth time than a conventional chart does — a common reason people turn to it when their birth time is uncertain.
Blind, sleeping and awake planets
Lal Kitab classifies planets by states that have no direct Parashari equivalent — andha (blind), sota (sleeping), jagrat (awake) — determined by house position and by the company a planet keeps. A sleeping planet is held to give little result until something wakes it.
Aspects work differently
Classical Jyotish gives each planet its own set of special aspects — Mars to the 4th and 8th, Jupiter to the 5th and 9th, Saturn to the 3rd and 10th. Lal Kitab simplifies this considerably, working mainly with the opposite house, which is one reason its readings can diverge sharply from a Parashari one on the same birth data.
Totka — the practical remedies
The remedies are the reason most people know the tradition. They are deliberately inexpensive and physical: feeding chapatis to dogs or cows, floating coal or coins in flowing water, burying something, giving away a specific item, keeping a vessel of water by the bed. No mantra initiation or ritual specialist is required.
How the remedies are meant to be used
Lal Kitab is prescriptive about method. A remedy is generally performed for a stated duration, often 43 days, and the texts caution against performing several at once, against doing them for someone else without their knowledge, and against continuing after the stated period.
Where it sits alongside classical Jyotish
Lal Kitab is not a replacement for a Parashari reading and does not claim to be. Practitioners commonly read a conventional chart for structure and timing, and turn to Lal Kitab for its remedial suggestions. Where the two disagree on a prediction, that reflects genuinely different methods rather than an error in either.